
The WHC600/350 is a compact industrial plastic crusher for PET bottles, hollow containers, smaller rigid moulded parts and selected production scrap. It can operate as a standalone granulator or connect with conveying, washing and downstream recycling equipment.
Best-Fit Applications
- Loose PET bottles and rigid plastic containers
- Small injection-moulded rejects and sprues
- Thin-wall PE, PP, PVC, ABS or PC parts after material review
- Pre-sized feed from a shredder or manual sorting line
Large lumps, thick automotive parts and oversized appliance housings may require a larger chamber or upstream shredding. Film processing also requires separate feed and rotor evaluation because lightweight material can bridge or wrap.
WHC600/350 Reference Configuration
| Item | Reference value |
|---|---|
| Main-shaft length | 600 mm |
| Rotor diameter | 350 mm |
| Main-shaft speed | 580 rpm |
| Rotor blades | 2 × 3 pieces |
| Fixed blades | 2 pieces |
| Main motor | 22 kW |
| Screen opening | 10–50 mm |
| Inlet size | 450 × 600 mm |
| Overall dimensions | 1650 × 1370 × 1950 mm |
| Reference weight | 1800 kg |
| Recorded capacity range | 300–600 kg/h |
These figures are reference data from the current product record. Actual capacity and flake size depend on material density, wall thickness, feed consistency, screen opening and blade condition.
Information Required for Selection
- Polymer type, material photos and contamination
- Maximum feed length, width and wall thickness
- Loose, baled or pre-shredded feed condition
- Required flake size and hourly throughput
- Conveyor, dust control and downstream washing requirements
- Country, voltage, frequency and operating hours
For a larger rotor, compare the WHC600/450 rigid plastic crusher. More models are available in the industrial plastic crusher category.
Request a WHC600/350 Proposal
Send material photos, maximum dimensions, target flake size, required capacity and electrical standard through the AMIGE inquiry page. We will review whether this compact model or a larger chamber is appropriate.






